Home > Uncategorized > Thoughts on invocations and benedictions…

Thoughts on invocations and benedictions…

December 23rd, 2008 Bryan Leave a comment Go to comments

I’ve been getting a lot of email expressing outrage at the selection of Rick Warren to offer up his prayers for our new president. One friend has sent me a laundry list of outrageous videos showcasing the offensive comments Pastor Rick has made about gays and lesbians. For instance:

His logic evades me. Yet there are a lot of people who listen to this guy and give him credit. Most pastors I know, even progressive ones, have a copy of Warren’s Purpose Driven Church and many have his more recent and more popular Purpose Driven Life. He’s had an enormous impact on the church in the US. But his language on homosexuality is laughably ignorant and blatantly homophobic. I have both his books. The “church” one is a helpful book for pastors to think creatively about church structures. But the “life” one reads more like a laundry list of do’s and don’ts, and expresses his right-wing agenda in a no-compromise way. I understand that Warren had done much to help victims of AIDS and has tried to reach across boundaries of “liberal” and “conservative.” Nevertheless, he has also expressed hateful opinions about gays and lesbians, comparing homosexuality to child rape and bestiality. Sadly, he doesn’t get it. I’d like to put a reading list together for him, and I’d include the following for his information and enlightenment:

“Same-Sex Unions in Premodern Europe” (John Boswell)


“Christianity, Social Tolerance, and Homosexuality: Gay People in Western Europe from the Beginning of the Christian Era to the Fourteenth Century” (John Boswell)


“Queering Christ: Beyond Jesus Acted Up” (Robert E. Goss)

“Jesus Acted Up: A Gay and Lesbian Manifesto” (Robert Goss)

Now, I realize he isn’t going to read that stuff, but those books, along with a host of others, really helped my perspective on these issues. More to the point, though, is the fact that the media has almost totally ignored the man Obama has selected to give the benediction. Rev. Joseph Lowery has a distinguished career as an advocate for the outcast. A civil rights leader, he has been in the trenches for a long time working for justice. He is a United Methodist pastor, which of course makes me proud. But he is also a clear voice for justice for all God’s people, and has publicly called for the full-inclusion of gays and lesbians in the church and beyond. I wish progressively-minded people would focus as much attention on Lowery and his message as they have complaining about Warren. Heck, we should all just ignore Warren and turn our attention to a man who has really struggled, advocated, fought and risked for the least and the lost – a man who has embodied the gospel message with his whole life.

Here is Lowery speaking controversial yet prophetic words at the funeral of Coreeta Scott King – embodying the spirt of MLK:

And here is some more information about Lowery at Wikipedia.

  • Shawn Lang
    I think that the Boswell book is particularly compelling. Thanks for posting this Bryan. You're a true comrade in the struggle!

    Peace
    Shawn
  • Joiarib
    What exactly don't you follow about Warren's comments in the clip you post? He says that a biological disposition to a behaviour does not mean that the behaviour should be indulged. Is this not true? I assume you have seen the film M.

    As for Obama's choice of Warren to deliver the inaugural invocation, it seems perfectly logical given thier identical stances on gay marriage.
  • I think it is pretty clear that you don't agree with me. I respect your difference of opinion, but I am unwilling to turn my comments here into some kind of argument. I'm sure you can find more interesting sparring partners in other venues.

    I would again encourage you to find an effective spiritual practice and to read the Bible. Good luck to you!
  • Joiarib
    Your response is disappointing on a number of levels. First, of course, is that you publish your thoughts, musings, and opinions for all the world to read—and invite comments on them—but then you don’t want to engage in a discussion about them. (And I don’t see why you have to characterize our exchange as an argument.) Surely you believe in a civil exchange of ideas, as well as the possibility that you could learn as well as teach. I presume—perhaps wrongly—that you don’t demand blind allegiance from your congregation but are willing to listen to their points of view. Don’t your virtual congregants deserve the same courtesy?

    Second, your advising me to read the Bible strikes me as both clichéd and a bit disingenuous. I would have thought that at least you would have coupled the Bible with some sacred scripture from outside the paternalistic Judeo-Christian tradition. The Vedas or Analects, perhaps. More significantly, after reviewing the archives of your blog, I find the word “Bible” occurs only once before (five months ago) and nowhere else have you suggested that such reading is useful or helpful. Why bring it up now? (Reviewing the archive was beneficial, though; it introduced me to the wonderful Orwellian term “reproductive justice.”)

    Third, your glib dismissal of me with "Good luck to you," strikes me as uncharitable and hurtful. Am I not as worthy of your ministrations as are the least and lost? Could I not be, in fact, among the least and lost?

    Finally, if your claim that the world is one blog shy of perfect is correct, perhaps mine, posted here, is the one that can bring it to perfection.
  • Thanks for your continued input. I'm glad you read the archives and found them somewhat useful.

    Your comments have encourage me to think a bit about what this blog is for and who it is for, etc.

    Originally, I started this blog (in a number of different formats) for my personal use and for sharing of ideas with a few friends who were my only audience. Eventually, i began to follow a number of United Methodist blogs, and decided to join the Methoblogroll and share my thoughts with the wider UM community.

    In my estimation, too many blogs have comments full of back and forth diatribes that seem rather useless to me. I am not really interested in argument or debate. I get enough of that in the rest of my life believe me! I'm just interested in expressing myself and hearing others do the same - which is far different from tit for tat debate.

    As far as the Bible goes, I assue you that I encourage everyone I know to read it - I so encourage people from my pulpit, in the Bible studies I lead, in the committees I lead, etc. I take the Bible seriously, and I believe it merits serious reflection and study, not proof-texting and reductionism.

    I also advocate for spiritual practice and discipline, and have done so in all the congregations I serve. To me, reading the Bible and developing a spiritual practice are the two most important things individual Christians can do. Communially, of course, we also benefit from the regular attendance of worship, the sharing in the sacraments, and Christian conferencing. I'm sorry that I haven't more clearly advocated for Bible study and spiritual discipline via this blog, but again, that was never it's purpose.

    With blogs becoming more and more popular, and more and more people reading this blog, perhaps I should reconsider:

    1. Should this blog exist at all? I post plenty of informatino on the internet in other forums without this blog. If this blog becomes a lightening rod for debate, instead of a forum for exchange, I'm just not interested.

    2. Should I post some more fundamental posts on basics for the uninitiated who would like a better sense of who I am and where I'm coming from?

    3. Should I simply close the comments?

    Your thoughts are appreciated, of course.
  • husnain
    "They have great topics like this one on www.energytalkradio.com and donate 30% to charity! Check them out."
blog comments powered by Disqus